Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?
From: philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD)
Date: Mon Oct 20 09:52:05 2008
References: <48FC7AE2.3020300@sympatico.ca> <a2f8f4470810200605i3605f53en140fe46c4a819732@mail.gmail.com>

I once upon a time  hit upon a hell of a lot of K25 out of date rolls 
for a penny each - with the yellow cloth bag type for those who remember.
This was my second best experience in my photographic life, after 
digital photography, with regards to wallet issues.

And I learned a lot then.
Use them, and don't complain if they fail.
But use them to try things you wouldn't have otherwise.
My two cents
Phx



Daniel Ridings wrote:

>Color negative film that is two years out of date should be thrown away.
>
>If you're using it, you're just using it to test. You can run all
>those variables below in your tests.
>
>I would say that you can then report back, but no one will be interested.
>
>Few of us spend so much money on cameras like Leicas just so that we
>save pennies by using out-of-date film.
>
>Buy fresh film.
>
>NPS is a professional film. It is intended to be stored properly and
>used when fresh.
>
>Do yourself a favor and forget it.
>
>Daniel
>
>On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>  
>
>>I shot a couple rolls of Fuji NPS 160, outdated 2006 film last week.
>>
>>The shots came out with low colour contrast, looking a bit washed out /
>>faded.
>>
>>My film processor guy  told me that the exposure was correct.
>>
>>I'm trying another roll with t different lab this week - a lab that is more
>>experienced (i.e. better, more expensive).
>>
>>My question - what do you typically find as the degradation of dated Fuji
>>NPS?
>>
>>- more exposure needed (i.e. slower speed)?
>>
>>- faded colours?  So more Photoshop / Lightroom time if I want to "improve"
>>the prints myself?
>>
>>So other effect, or combination of effects?
>>
>>Vick
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

Replies: Reply from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Reply from leica at rcmckee.com (R. Clayton McKee) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)
Message from dlridings at gmail.com (Daniel Ridings) ([Leica] What it the characteristic degradation of Fuji NPS 160?)