Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/10/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Fri Oct 10 09:21:24 2008
References: <BAY113-F3958DC112153FF833CFEA08C350@phx.gbl>

On Oct 10, 2008, at 8:13 AM, Vick Ko wrote:

> Another thing that saddens me is that me beautiful son still  
> continues to stick his tongue at me whenever I point a camera at him.


how old is he?

if he is under 21 years old, do it several times a day, every day, and  
it will quickly stop,

Steve


>
>
> So, no need for those "portrait lenses" like the 75 or 80 or 90.   
> Unless they are macro, they are a bit too short for tele-range  
> isolation.
>
> ...Vick
>
>
>> From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>> To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Subject: RE: [Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?
>> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:06:27 -0700
>>
>>
>> Let's all try to contribute to what (generally ) does not work....  
>> and
>> why.....  We all have experiences.....
>>
>>
>> Frank Filippone
>> red735i@earthlink.net
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?)
In reply to: Message from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] Vacation Camera Lenses: What did NOT work?)