Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] a serious question
From: photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest)
Date: Thu Sep 25 08:42:07 2008
References: <7A863272-CCBA-4DC5-84E9-0E546CDF201E@mac.com> <20080925024515.55176af0@linux-019a.site> <8FEDFDC8-2735-4DDC-967C-20E849F6DF4D@mac.com> <20080925111125.5bd28ac2@linux-019a.site> <200809251536.BCK23858@rg5.comporium.net>
So what is the reason that Leica has just a tiny fraction of the market
share then? Yes, they are great products, incredible at what they do.
Just too expensive for the company to compete with the big two in
volume. Leica's cult of exclusivity and incredible high price is what
keeps them down.
PhilFo
Replies:
Reply from frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE) ([Leica] a serious question)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] a serious question)
In reply to:
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] a serious question)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] a serious question)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] a serious question)
Message from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] a serious question)
Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] a serious question)