Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50
From: luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Wed Sep 24 12:17:36 2008
References: <113577.89129.qm@web84203.mail.re3.yahoo.com>

Hi Jan,

I don't know how it performs your Elmar, I can talk about the very old  
one LTM, is a very good lens giving very nice lights and contrasted  
light situations, I know the latest Elmar 2,8/50 this is for me an  
excellent lens you can use in extremely contrasted situations and also  
on situations you want to have rich grey tones. I have also a  
Summicron Collapsible, is a great lens, it give a very special B&W  
with absolutely nice smooth tones, on the point of vue of flare it is  
more resistant than the Elmar.

Both lenses are beautiful to enjoy.

I've said my opinion talking about B&W, I don't know in color.

Hoping you show your pictures and share our opinions

Saludos cordiales
Lluis


El 24/09/2008, a las 5:03, Jan Decher escribi?:

> Hi LUG,
> I am new to this list and just purchased a used chrome M6 and some  
> older lenses.
> Which one should I keep as the best (sharpest, best bokeh) user  
> "normal" lens:
> 3.5/50 collabsible Elmar (last version with meter and feet scale)
> 2.0/50 collapsible Summicron (ca. 1954 version in feet only)
> Jan
> Vermont
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from alcedo at verizon.net (Jan Decher) ([Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50)