[Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50

Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/09/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50
From: alcedo at verizon.net (Jan Decher)
Date: Tue Sep 23 20:04:05 2008

Hi LUG, 
I am new to this list and just purchased a used chrome M6 and some older 
lenses.  
Which one should I keep as the best (sharpest, best bokeh) user "normal" 
lens: 
3.5/50 collabsible Elmar (last version with meter and feet scale) 
2.0/50 collapsible Summicron (ca. 1954 version in feet only)
Jan 
Vermont

Replies: Reply from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50)
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50)
Reply from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50)
Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50)
Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50)
Reply from vick.ko at sympatico.ca (Vick Ko) ([Leica] 3.5/50 or 2.0/50)