Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/08/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Surely the judges comments are just as anonymous as the pictures being judged - unless some clever people recognise the style of writing/expression, there is no reason I can see for not printing the judges opinions below each picture when the competition has finished (of course only if the comments are printable :-) ) On second thoughts, that might be a real Pandora's Box - even more reason to do it!! Cheers Douglas Steve Barbour wrote: > On Aug 6, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Brian Reid wrote: >> This month there were 11 judges. We get a different number of judges >> every month because not everyone can do it every month. Three of the >> judges declined to evaluate a few of the images because those images >> had the photographer's name on them. 4 of the judges are not members >> of the LUG, 5 are current members, and 2 are ex-members. I very much >> like the winning photograph. >> >> Every month I am surprised by the results of the judging. I don't >> think that my own first choice has ever made it into the top three. > > yes Brian, if that is widely true , it would be sweet if the contest > encouraged discussion of the entries. Further, if the deliberation of > the judges were evident, discussion could lead to some real insight > and learning... > > thanks, Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >