Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/07/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes. without doubt. Very roughly speaking: 28 (now most used on M8) has become 35 (which was most used on M6) 50 has become 75 (which was second most used on M6) 75 has become 90 (which was rarely used on M6) and yes - lust for 24 and 21 has increased dramatically to fill (roughly) the 28 (which was used almost as much as the 35 on the M6) hole. Fond regards, George george@imagist.com http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist On Jul 30, 2008, at 9:11 PM, Ric Carter wrote: > Okay, I have a pretty good feel for the physics of full frame > versus M8 cell conversion -- 1.3 multiplication -- field of view > versus focal length -- that stuff. That's not what I'm looking for > here. > > Now the question for M8 users. > > Did your favorite or standard or most often used lens change from > classic M to M8? > > If you used to like 50s , have you switched to 35s? If you old > favorite was 35s, are you using the 28 mostly now? > Did 50 lovers stay with 50? > > Are you less likely to use 90 or 135? > > Are you more likely to use ultra-wides? > > Thanks. > > Ric Carter > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/ricc/ > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information