Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2008/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON
From: photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest)
Date: Mon Jun 23 15:25:25 2008
References: <f2f825f20806230930g46c6412fsb4ef3d76941d20cd@mail.gmail.com> <0K2X002H2L8VHB50@l-daemon> <200806232310.m5NNAgfd049476@mail.imagecraft.com>
I think the Noctilux is just too good and won't glow like the
Canon .95. Sometimes lenses can be made too well and the Nocti vs. .95
Canon is perfect example. Also, at 1/10 the price, the Canon wins in my
book.
PhilFo
Replies:
Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
In reply to:
Message from vroger at gmail.com (Victor Rubin) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)