Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/06/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon Jun 23 15:08:53 2008
References: <f2f825f20806230930g46c6412fsb4ef3d76941d20cd@mail.gmail.com> <0K2X002H2L8VHB50@l-daemon>
 
Isn't the 0.95 a "bargain" (probably around $1000-$1500) vs. $5000+ 
for a Nocti? That could be reason enough :-)

At 12:38 PM 6/23/2008, Ted Grant wrote:

>"However!"
>
>Yeah I know here he goes again with the damn "however!" :-)
>
>But why wouldn't one shoot this with the Noctilux at f 1.0?  Obviously if
>one had a Noctilux, wouldn't it be the same effect? Similar glow at f 1.0?
>
>Although the "glow factor" may not have been as distinct as we see here.
>
>Thoughts?

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, 
please use richard at imagecraft.com)
Replies: Reply from photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
 In reply to: Message from vroger at gmail.com (Victor Rubin) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] THIS IS SHEILA JOHNSON)