Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: PAW 16 - Phx's
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (Geoff Hopkinson)
Date: Tue Apr 29 14:11:37 2008
References: <48177F7D.4010306@tele2.fr>

Hi Philippe, I don't pretend to be able to identify the lens from that pic.
Since it is close up but with a four thirds focal length, I have no idea how
much DoF you would expect. Is this the standard 14-50 at 3.5? I note the
high shutter speed and the ISO. I don't think you needed the -1 exposure but
that is another discussion. The OOF areas are hard on my eyeballs as I wake
up here. Have you fuzzi-logiced this one a bit?

Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Philippe AMARD
Sent: Wednesday, 30 April 2008 06:05
To: liste leica reflex; Leica Users Group
Subject: [Leica] IMG: PAW 16 - Phx's

I have lost the count of weeks. But here's my submission for last week's 
PAW.

A test/contest/quiz:;

Knowing that the camera was the L1 (cf. exif), what lens was used?

http://tinyurl.com/3mgw52

C&C mucho appreciated
phx


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 16 - Phx's - Geoff)
In reply to: Message from philippe.amard at tele2.fr (Philippe AMARD) ([Leica] IMG: PAW 16 - Phx's)