Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] For Ted
From: abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge)
Date: Wed Apr 23 09:12:23 2008
References: <200804210406.m3L4673q074558@server1.waverley.reid.org> <BLU121-W7CBF508CA239AECB49172D4E30@phx.gbl> <D6C5BB42-A7A1-4EAF-B748-FF6D06D4D10C@cox.net>

I'm so utterly clueless that I don't understand your objection Steve.
I read about kidding Ted who's not a fan of peeling paint and two
rather interesting (to me) images.

I found nothing objectionable in either, certainly NOT a waste of
electrons which isn't something I'd like to see suggested to any image
posted here in good faith.

Adam

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote:
>
>  On Apr 22, 2008, at 8:16 PM, Aram Langhans wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Hi Ted.  Found this great peeling paint in Death Valley at Scotty's 
> > Castle
> and thought of you, so I snapped it.
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/dv/Scottys+Castle-3564.jpg.html While
> this paint isn't exactly pealing, it is getting some help from a few
> projectiles.
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Aram/dv/Aguerberry+Camp-3383.jpg.html  
> Aram
> >
>
>  a waste of electrons Aram, and certainly not funny,  nor in very good
> taste,
>
>
>  why?
>
>
>
>  Steve
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Leica Users Group.
>  See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from lists at mcclary.net (Harrison McClary) ([Leica] For Ted)
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] For Ted)
In reply to: Message from leicar at q.com (Aram Langhans) ([Leica] For Ted)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] For Ted)