Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2008/02/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be
From: nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Wed Feb 27 22:03:50 2008
References: <541F0D48-41FF-4D3B-80FA-755AE07D2045@mac.com> <3cad89990802271758w30b740d9h9922ee27828dd912@mail.gmail.com>

This is what I have been predicting for several years. I suppose my  
timing was off, but I still believe that the only commercial future  
for Leica is as a subsidiary of a larger company where Leica's  
indisputable excellence in designing optics can be leveraged and  
properly valued.

Nathan

On 28-feb-2008, at 2:58, Jayanand Govindaraj wrote:

>  But I am afraid that I see Leica sold to one of
> Panasonic/Sony/Canon/Nikon/Samsung in the not very distant future.
>

Nathan Wajsman
nathan@nathanfoto.com
General photography:
http://www.nathanfoto.com
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.frozenlight.eu
Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



Replies: Reply from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)
Reply from ken at iisaka.org (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)
Reply from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)
Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Erwin telling it like it may be)