Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 Question_Robert
From: robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier)
Date: Sun Dec 16 19:31:21 2007
References: <C38B2292.7C07D%mark@rabinergroup.com><062001c84040$ae87d040$0200a8c0@robertbxucevjs> <C2E05F2D-A67F-40C8-A5A5-9BAD8A574BB6@comcast.net>

Len,

That 4x6 crop from the 27x40 image looks very, very good.    However, I 
saved it in PS and then looked at the image size, and it is not 4x6.   It is 
about 1.6 x 2.5 inches.

Aside from that size issue, that is exactly what I was looking for.  I shoot 
C41 on Hasselblad and scan the negatives on an Epson 4871 and then have 
lightjet prints made, either 25x25 or 30x30.   They look very good (and sell 
through a gallery in Minneapolis) and your crop from an M8 image looks as 
good as what I get from the Hasselblad.   But what does the image size 
discrepancy mean?

Robert

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Leonard Taupier" <len-1@comcast.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2007 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 Question_Robert


>I enlarged an M8 photo to 27X40 inches and then cropped out a 4X6  inch 
>piece for you to look at. You can do a save as from my photo and  print it 
>as a 4X6 print to see how the resolution looks. I printed it  on a R1800 
>and the 4X6 looks great. Here is the crop:
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/LeonardT/M8_001/ 
> L1008603_crop_4X6.jpg.html>
>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2ky5hx
>
> Here is the full size original photo.
>
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/LeonardT/M8_001/L1008603.jpg.html>
>
> or
>
> http://tinyurl.com/33v6jf
>
> Both the crop and the original are jpg conversions from the raw file  as 
> it came out of the camera. No other post processing.
>
> I hope this helps,
> Len
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 16, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Robert Meier wrote:
>
>> I keep reading about how much everyone who has gotten an M8 likes  it. 
>> I have been wondering how it would do for large prints that I  have been 
>> using my Hasselblad to produce.   How would, say, a 24x36  print from the 
>> M8 compare next to, say, a 30x30 print from a  Hasselblad?    Would it be 
>> as detailed?  Would it appear as  sharp?    What would be your overall 
>> impression?
>> Thanks very much,  Robert
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



Replies: Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] M8 Question_Robert)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Podcast M or R)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] M8 Question)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] M8 Question_Robert)