Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/11/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] RAM in Laptop
From: pjleeson at mchsi.com (Philip Leeson)
Date: Thu Nov 29 08:13:20 2007
References: <29378842.1196277676875.JavaMail.root@elwamui-royal.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <015a01c8322a$6a9ae350$3fd0a9f0$@net> <aed41d690711281803x2ffd327fn8a39f59b077f569b@mail.gmail.com> <FD628F02-6102-489F-B1F4-3447ED8D60D1@nathanfoto.com>

In my experience, with Windows machines (of any vintage) a reformat of  
the hard drive and reinstall of programs speeds things up a lot more  
than more RAM.

Phil

On Nov 29, 2007, at 12:29 AM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Hi Jeffery,
>
> I don't know. I just realized that my desktop at home in NL is not 4  
> but 5 years old. It is far from non-functional. I bought it back  
> then with 1 GB RAM, which I have since doubled, and I also added a  
> second internal HD and a better DVD burner at some point. It runs  
> Lightroom and CS2 just fine, as well as the other software I have on  
> it. Granted, I still use Office 2000 on it, but so what?
>
> Likewise, my Powerbook G4 which now is my main computer (since it is  
> the only one I have with me here in Spain) came with 512 MB when I  
> bought it in early 2006, but for about ?100 I added the RAM to bring  
> it up to 1.25 GB, and it  runs both Lightroom and Photoshop just  
> fine. Basically almost all the pictures I have posted this year have  
> been processed on this computer.
>
> I have found over the years that one of Adobe's virtues is that  
> successive versions of their programs do not necessarily get bigger  
> and slower the way most other software does. When I went from  
> Photoshop 7 to CS, I discovered to my delight that CS actually ran  
> faster on the same hardware.
>
> I think that as long as one does not follow Microsoft's upgrade  
> path, a computer can easily last several years before it is obsolete.
>
> Nathan
>
> On 29-nov-2007, at 3:03, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I think that "as much as you can afford" is the best answer. I  
>>> will no
>>> longer buy a computer with less than 4gb. A PC that I bought that  
>>> was a real
>>> "screamer" 5 years ago is now completely non-functional. Just  
>>> starting
>>> Windows and getting Outlook up and running takes about 15 minutes.  
>>> What you
>>> buy now will be made obsolete as soon as possible. That's what keeps
>>> computer manufacturers in business. Today's screamer is tomorrow's  
>>> molasses
>>> in winter. An Apple notebook that I bought in early 2005 now  
>>> crawls with its
>>> 512mb RAM. Same computer, but new software. Since you cannot feed  
>>> the
>>> computer steroids, buy a muscular one to begin with.
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Jeffery L. Smith
>> New Orleans, LA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> nathan@nathanfoto.com
> General photography:
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from jagdishvari at earthlink.net (vipul/jalpa) ([Leica] RAM in Laptop)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] RAM in Laptop)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] RAM in Laptop)
Message from nathan at nathanfoto.com (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] RAM in Laptop)