Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/10/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>Henning: Thanks for being the first on our block to show the >Rochester goings-on. > >I notice that you were shooting at 320 and 640, with EVs of anywhere >between -1 and -2, inclusive. > >Would you share why you picked the particular settings you did? I >understand that these settings are better than using 1250 or 2500. >But have you found some "sweet spot" settings for some set of given >conditions? Also, lens and f/stop for the indoor shots? > >And how on earth did you keep Tuulikki relatively sharp at 1/4 sec??? :-) > >Good show! > >--Peter > Hi, Peter. Too bad you couldn't make it. It was a good meeting. Basically I shoot at -2/3EV. The M8 does way better with underexposure than my Canons, and has seemingly more 'bits' left at the low end. So I shoot DNG's and just make sure that the highlights that I might be interested in aren't clipped. I find that I like the results at 320 and -1 2/3 better than 640 and -2/3. 640 and -2 are reserved for the very worst. It's nowhere near as clean as the Canon 5D shots, but I don't necessarily like the results less. Detail is maintained. A lot of the shots at the LHSA were under bad but changing light conditions, so I didn't necessarily change the settings for the optimum. When I took the picture of Tuulikki I don't think any of us were really sharp :-). It was about midnight in the hotel bar. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com