Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/10/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] tiny tank
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Thu Oct 11 07:52:29 2007
References: <a3f189160710110628t767d7de4x8ee1f16b4eafe4ed@mail.gmail.com> <470E28BA.6000004@waltjohnson.com> <20071011140429.505572FDA3@donald.hostspirit.ch>

As long as our (and their) fearless leaders have help with the matches.

Didier Ludwig wrote:
> Hey, this tank would have been much too big and dangerous for Daba-U and 
> Saddie. This one here is still good enough to get your fingers burned, but 
> definitely cheaper:
> http://tinyurl.com/2vm9c5
> (Leica M6, 75mm Summilux, Kodak Plus-X 125)
> :-)
> Didier
>
>
>
>   
>> Think of how much more fun George could have had....He and Saddam going 
>> mano a mano with tiny tanks. I'd suggest tax reductions for the masses as 
>> well but that might be premature. If General Dynamics built the darn 
>> things they'd cost 30 mil apiece. (and break easily)
>> Former roadie (nee groupie)
>>
>> Sonny Carter wrote:
>>     
>>> http://www.miniaturebrainwave.com/2007/09/26/tiny-weapons-of-mass-destruction/
>>>       
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>   

In reply to: Message from sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter) ([Leica] tiny tank)
Message from walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson) ([Leica] tiny tank)
Message from leica at screengang.com (Didier Ludwig) ([Leica] tiny tank)