Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hello Luggers, Cementing my reputation as a gear head I have been following Len?s lead and using Howard Ritter?s procedures for checking out reflections possibly caused by IR cut filters. I shot a series of pictures ? placing a flashlight in the upper right corner and looking for reflections in the lower left. I did this with both my 50 Summilux Asph and my 35 Summilux Asph. Findings: with IR filters on at f1.4 both lenses exhibited the reflection from the upper right flash light in the lower left of the photo. With filter off there was no reflection with the 50 Lux Asph and a slight ghosting with the 35 Lux Asph ? so at least for the 50mm lens the filter is the sole contributing factor. Here are some snaps at ISO 640, camera tripod mounted, to support my conclusions: 1. The 35 Lux with IR cut filter on at f1.4 showing the ghosting on the books on the lower left shelf. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/UV+IR+Code+Pix/ Lux35IRonw.jpg.html http://tinyurl.com/3b9vrg 2. The 35 Lux at f1.4 with no filter ? there is a slight blue smudge of ghosting still visible just above the books in the lower left shelf so lens design also contributes to the reflection http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/UV+IR+Code+Pix/ Lux35noIRcutw.jpg.html http://tinyurl.com/2tyl57 3. Here is the 50 Lux Asph at f1.4 with IR cut filter on and the refection is present http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/UV+IR+Code+Pix/ Lux50IRcutfilterw.jpg.html http://tinyurl.com/2tg8ax 4. The 50 lux at f1.4 with no filter and no reflection http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/UV+IR+Code+Pix/ Lux50nofilterw.jpg.html http://tinyurl.com/2jan65 I closed down the 50 Lux with the filter on to see when the reflection would disappear. At f4.0 there was still a slight reflection but by f5.6 it was gone. The 35 Lux asph exhibited similar characteristics so I didn?t bother to post thiosde pictures. 5. The 50 lux at f4.0 with filter and a slight reflection http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/UV+IR+Code+Pix/ Lux50withIRatf4_0w.jpg.html http://tinyurl.com/3x88ht 6. The 50 lux at f5.6 with filter and no reflection http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Howard+Cummer/UV+IR+Code+Pix/ Lux50wIRfilteratf5_6w.jpg.html http://tinyurl.com/37ne4e What does this prove? What we all knew for a long time ? that filters tend to cause unwanted reflections ? and should be avoided for that reason, if possible. But, because of the magenta issue with the M8 that is not possible so we will have to live with it and in 99.9% of my pictures it isn?t an issue. Cheers Howard (in Hot Hong Kong still waiting for his new M8) On 1 Oct 2007, at 3:36 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:28:09 -0400 > From: Leonard Taupier <len-1@comcast.net> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Lens reflections from IR cut filter - Verified > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Message-ID: <18E1602D-E3AD-476A-8940-B6F95C3C84B9@comcast.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; > format=flowed > > > I was able to duplicate Howard's lens reflection problem using Howard > Ritter's procedure. > > <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/LeonardT/M8+Filter/ > Reflection.jpg.html> > > or > > http://tinyurl.com/3blq22 > > I was not able to duplicate the problem using a 50mm Summicron with > filter but was able to duplicate it using a Noctilux at f1.0 with a > UV/IR filter. I could not duplicate the problem with the filter > removed. The smaller light is very bright. Also note the coma with > the Noctilux. Unfortunately my Summilux is still with Leica getting 6- > bit coded so I couldn't try it. > > Len