Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> It was glorious last night out here in the Upper Left Corner. > > I also saw the Eclipse last cycle while at the Washington Coast. > Creepy. Cool. Sobering. I watched it very erly in the a.m. with Leica > Trinovid 8x32 binoculars and wished I could have captured the image and > the colors - like a rough iron ball glowing just under cherry red. > > I've never had a lot of luck photographing the moon. Always had good > bodies and lenses. Never learned how to do it right. > > I suppose I could set the R9 on Program with the 70-180 APO at > 180mm/2.8/infinity and go for it. > > But the really big lenses (Telyts and the Big White Lenses From Japan) > provide a larger neg image suitable for enlargement and showing more > arresting detail of the moon's surface. > > Thanks for the reminder. Harvest Moon is always the best moon during > my favorite season. > > Bob in Seattle (where it's sunny and clear. Go figure) > > > > > On Sep 26, 2007, at 12:46, Mark Rabiner wrote: > > Sept. 26, 3:45 p.m. EDT - Always the full Moon occurring nearest to the > Autumnal Equinox. Corn, pumpkins, squash, beans, and wild rice-- the > chief > Indian staples--are now ready for gathering. > > > > > > > Mark William Rabiner > rabinergroup.com > > My whole life I wanted a good shot of the moon and only in the past couple years did I pull it off. The main problem is not having a lens long enough and over exposing. Its a lot brighter than you think it is said Ansel. Like some high percent of the reflectance of it from the sun. You need a 400 or 500 mm lens or longer. And its good to do it at night. Mark William Rabiner rabinergroup.com