Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 21mm Lens Questions
From: walt at waltjohnson.com (Walt Johnson)
Date: Tue Sep 25 13:17:31 2007
References: <32359532.1190685452760.JavaMail.root@elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <9b678e0709251141o32b6bca9j343021b5e899f9e4@mail.gmail.com> <EC7CD594-50D4-44B5-99C9-D3013EA048BF@charter.net>

S.D.

Clayton already let the PIG out of the bag. Next, you'll be doing the 
same think concerning cheap lenses. How can we make great "Smith-like 
images using substandard glass. Besides, Leica is already on its last 
leg and needs our contributions.

W.J.

slobodan dimitrov wrote:
> Gene Smith shot with a 28mm F8 (that Schweitzer stuff) with the 
> emulsions of his day.
> It didn't hurt him image wise.
> I use the Skopar only because of being able to use it on a IIIa.
> Though, I have to admit that I'm awfully tempted to get a Biogon.
> Maybe with the next big job...!
>
> s.d.
>
>
> On Sep 25, 2007, at 11:41 AM, Don Dory wrote:
>
>> Frank,
>> I will echo Henning's comments.  The Biogon is a very sharp, well
>> built lens.  So, if you can live shooting at 4.5 then that is the lens
>> to get.  If you need 2.8 then I would hunt around for used 21 ASPH
>> lenses.  The Zeiss 21 2.8 is very good out 1/2 way but resolution
>> falls off in the outer fields wide open.  By 4.5 it is good all the
>> way but then why not get the Biogon?
>>
>> On 9/24/07, red735i@earthlink.net <red735i@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have a want for a 21mm lens.  the Leica made Elmarits ( ASPH, or 
>>> Non ASPH) are too expensive for me.  Ditto the Super Angulons
>>>
>>> I have a 21mm finder already ( from my 16 year old Contax RF days).
>>>
>>> I am asking about these 3 lenses......
>>>
>>> 21/4.5 ZM Zeiss Biogon
>>> 21/2.8 ZM Zeiss Biogon
>>> 21mm Color Skopar.  P ( M Mount )  or Non-P, LTM
>>>
>>> I am interested in relative optical quality, and to a lesser extent, 
>>> mechanical build quality and smoothness.
>>>
>>> For those with any relative experience to the Leica lenses, please 
>>> comment.
>>>
>>> Note.. I have read Erwin's review on the 21/2.8.... he says good 
>>> things.  But by comparison to the 4.5 ????
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Frank
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Don
>> don.dory@gmail.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] 21mm Lens Questions)
In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (red735i@earthlink.net) ([Leica] 21mm Lens Questions)
Message from don.dory at gmail.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] 21mm Lens Questions)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan dimitrov) ([Leica] 21mm Lens Questions)