Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/09/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Steve, Well, what I would mind to say is that maybe digital outperforms different from film, on other words, I usually shot Plus and Tri X developped on XTOL, and I know that this produce a great tolerance between blacks and whites, or sunny and shadow areas. Do you think that digital has the same results? Saludos cordiales Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En nombre de Steve Unsworth Enviado el: domingo, 09 de septiembre de 2007 20:48 Para: LUG Group Asunto: Re: [Leica] Steve Unsworth PAW - week 33 Hi Luis The Tri-Elmar is interesting, but I get the feeling it isn't quite up to the standard of the prime 28/35/50 lenses. But it makes a good travel lens. If there's are discrepancies in the contrast that's down to the post-processing. If was a very bright day and there were areas in shade and others in bright sunshine. Cloudy, or later in the day, would have been better. Thanks for looking Steve On 9/9/07 19:41, "Luis Ripoll" <luisripoll@telefonica.net> wrote: > Very interesting to see your new experiences with the M8, very nice > set, I see you get a great use of the 24 and the Tri-Elmar is an > interesting lens for this camera, as said before, prbably the F4 > "liittaion" is not so hard with a digital you can change easily the ISO. > > I appreciate some B&W pictures quite more contrasted than others, is > there any reason? _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information