Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: M8 problems
From: kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu Aug 30 20:31:18 2007
References: <083120070322.23813.46D7898300091E7000005D05219791299503010CD2079C080C03BF970A9D9F9A0B9D09@mchsi.com>

> -------------- Original message from "Luis Ripoll"  
> <luisripoll@telefonica.net>: --------------
>
>
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> I've found really interesting your arguments, but beside all the  
>> mentionned
>> points, for me it remain one point, the format. I want to use my  
>> lenses
>> on the original focal lenght. I hope, and I think that Leica will  
>> made a 1:1
>> format in the future.

Luis...suggest,   buy it now... and use a 35...


pretend it's a 50...



Steve





>>
>>
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Luis
>>
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org] En  
>> nombre de
>> Peter Klein
>> Enviado el: jueves, 30 de agosto de 2007 20:04
>> Para: lug@leica-users.org
>> Asunto: Re: [Leica] Re: M8 problems
>>
>>
>> Larry:
>>
>> Sounds like you really have two issues:
>>
>> - Do I need digital at all?
>> - Do I need (or want) an M8?
>>
>> Digital is convenient. Digital has less dynamic range than  
>> negative film,
>> but ISO for ISO, it's cleaner than most film. You don't buy film and
>> processing, you buy a camera.
>>
>> I'm with Tina and George and Sonny--my M8 gives me the best image  
>> quality
>> I've seen from a 35mm-size camera.
>>
>> No doubt about it, the M8 also has quirks and hidden costs that  
>> derive from
>> those quirks. We have the IR filter/cyan drift issues and the need  
>> for
>> coding of 35mm and wider lenses. There have been reliability  
>> issues with
>> some cameras, particularly early models. Most of the really bad  
>> problems
>> seem to have been fixed.
>>
>> But every so often, somebody's M8 fails, and we hear about it  
>> quickly. The
>> Internet amplifies the problems, and it seems like every M8 is a  
>> piece of
>> crap. I liken it to watching your local television news. It seems  
>> like
>> there is a child molester on every block, and a terrorist behind  
>> every tree.
>> But is that really the case?
>>
>> We can scream from today till next Tuesday about how Leica shoulda  
>> done this
>> and oughta done that, how could they not know about the IR issue,  
>> and how
>> dare a $5000 camera not be perfect? But the fact is that Leica is  
>> a small
>> company, and it's trying to compete with very deep pockets from  
>> Japan, Inc.
>> And the problems of very fast lenses and close-to-the-sensor RF  
>> lenses mean
>> Leica has more to deal with than the DSLR makers.
>>
>> The real question is "what do I get for my five grand, and is it  
>> worth it to
>> *me*? And if the thing dies, can I live with the delays while it's  
>> fixed.
>>
>> My pet peeve is that they should give us a lens selection menu.  
>> And I am
>> annoyed about the focus shift issues--they are not as bad as some  
>> people
>> make them, but they are real.
>>
>> I knew about all the issues except focus shift, and I still bought  
>> the
>> camera. I waited 6 months until it looked like the major teething  
>> pains had
>> been fixed. I'm not rich, I still can't believe how much the damn  
>> thing
>> cost, and I am still very happy I bought it.
>>
>> No one can guarantee that you will get a perfect,trouble-free M8.  
>> But it is
>> telling that most of the people here who have M8s love them, and  
>> even those
>> who have had failures want them back so they can shoot with them.
>> I've been lucky so far, no major problems. I'm still fine-tuning my
>> shooting to find the sweet spot between blown highlights and too  
>> much shadow
>> noise. My own feelings are about 5% occasional buyer's remorse and  
>> 95% "I
>> LOVE this camera."
>>
>> Only you can decide if you want an M8. The way you're talking,  
>> film works
>> for you, you don't need the immediacy of digital most of the time. If
>> that's the case, why switch? OTOH, if you are interested in exploring
>> digital while maintaining the same control layout and general  
>> shooting style
>> as you did with Ms and manual SLRs, then the M8 is worthy of  
>> consideration.
>> If the M8 is not your cup of tea but you want a good, affordable
>> high-quality digital, consider the Pentax K10D or the Olympus  
>> E-510, both
>> very worthy shooter's cameras.
>>
>> But if you love RF shooting and the way Leica lenses draw images,  
>> the M8 is
>> the only digital game in town. It takes some work and adjustment  
>> to get the
>> highest quality of which the M8 is capable. But it can be done,  
>> and when
>> you get it, it is incredible. You can argue that Brand C gives  
>> cleaner high
>> ISO images, but not at the level of detail the M8 gives.
>>
>> I'm shooting more with my M8 than I ever did with film. I have  
>> touched my
>> E-1 and my film Ms each exactly once since I got the M8 5 months  
>> ago--the
>> E-1 for a macro shot and the film M for a classical concert. That  
>> ought to
>> tell you something.
>>
>> Reverse peer pressure: Regardless of what you decide, you and your  
>> photos
>> are always welcome around here!
>>
>> --Peter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from ken at iisaka.org (Ken Iisaka) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
Reply from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)
In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com) ([Leica] Re: M8 problems)