Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina, I had the same experience as you when it came to scanning archives of negatives. We had about 25,000 35 mm B&W negatives from the 40's through 60's showing industrial processes, workers, families, locations. A colleague of mine was compiling a book on the evolution of the US as an industrial nation and wanted a large selection of photographs. Today he might have been advised to go to China. Each negative took about 5 minutes to scan at high resolution. That would have taken a full year of 40 hour weeks. We hired a graduate student to do the job but after reviewing her work we found it to be inadequate and had to let her go. Anyway, we came to the realization that since only about 10% of the negatives showed scenes of interest, there was no point in scanning the whole archive in high resolution. Fortunately most of the negatives had been cut into strips and filed in polyethylene storage pages. Each of the pages was numbered. Our scanning software had a lower resolution Batch Scanning mode which enabled the scanning time to be considerably reduced. We could scan all the negatives within a month, but of course, with no alteration or adjustment. Once the negative strip was inserted into the carrier, the process was automatic. The graduate student was rehired and set to work. Each page was stored as a separate file, numbered identically to the storage sheet. We could view each file as a slide show. If an image proved interesting, the file number was marked. At leisure we could look at the actual negatives in the storage sheet, identify the photo of interest, and do a high quality scan. Conceptually the process was like viewing a contact sheet displayed on a 20" screen. So don't do a quality scan of all your negatives. Not all images are worth saving. At least mine aren't. Larry Z