Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/08/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tran-Elmar could also be a 50mm labeled as a 35... On Tuesday 07 August 2007 22:23, Eric Korenman wrote: > how about a tran-elmar? > Formerly a 50mm, now a 35mm. > > :) > > On 8/7/07, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote: > > On Aug 7, 2007, at 2:11 PM, Tom Schofield wrote: > > > Perhaps a new version could be on its way ;-) -- Let's start a > > > rumor -- 24-35mm Tri-Elmar, or perhaps a 24-50mm f/2.8 Quad- > > > Elmarit, focusing to .7m.! I always wondered why they left that > > > 24mm gap between the two Tri-Elmars. It also ends the confusion as > > > to which Tri-Elmar you are referring. > > > > a Bi - Elmar... swings both ways... > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > Tom > > > > > > On Aug 7, 2007, at 12:16 PM, Leonard Taupier wrote: > > >> I was just searching the Leica site and could not find a listing > > >> for the normal Tri-Elmar. After a little more searching I found it > > >> was discontinued somewhere around the end of June. It seems the > > >> front element is no longer available. It's made from > > >> Trichloroethylene which I always thought was a cleaning solvent. > > >> I expect the lens will be hard to find now. > > >> > > >> I don't know if this info was originally posted. Sorry if this is > > >> old info. > > >> > > >> Len > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Leica Users Group. > > >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Leica Users Group. > > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information