Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/07/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] OT really ?
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Tue Jul 10 18:12:49 2007
References: <079127B0-6331-4B23-8908-245D280037AE@cox.net> <746FA6CF-5D77-458C-8908-CFB3E5BA3E4A@cox.net>
 
Unfortunately, we couldn't make this stuff up. Even the pointy-haired
boss in Dilbert shows better sense.

On 7/10/07, Steve Barbour <kididdoc@cox.net> wrote:
> sorry....
>
>
> > http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/10/washington/11cnd-surgeon.html?
> > ex=1341720000&en=0ca10e042df1e70f&ei=5089&partner=rssyahoo&emc=rss
> >
> > or
> >
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/322o6l
> >
> >
> > can you believe that...  ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


-- 
Jeffery L. Smith
New Orleans, LA
In reply to: Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] really ?)
Message from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] OT really ?)