Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/06/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Marc, Amen! Jack Marc James Small wrote: > We seem to have this discussion on the LUG about every six months. > Allow me to summarize: > > a) A few folks never trim and never seem to have problems. Leitz > and Leica have always recommended trimming out of concern for film > chips which might clog up the film-transport mechanism. Note the > decal on the inner surface of IIIc and later LTM bodies to this > effect. Several years ago, Tom Abrahamson posted that he had never > seen such a jam in all of his many years of working on LTM and M > bodies. (It is important to remember that Tom was the principal > technical adviser to Oscar Barnack back in the 1920's, at the same > time when Ted Grant was doing his best to convince Ernst Leitz II to > put the LEICA camera into production. We owe them both a huge debt of > gratitude. <he grins maliciously> > > b) Leitz/Leica recommend the use of the ABLON template. Zeiss > Ikon marketed a similar template, and there are a number of Japanese > and British copies available. These are readily available and do not > generally demand a high purchase price unless bougth at a Tamarkin > auction. I have one somewhere. The downside to this is that it takes > some time to use, has to be done in advance, and requires a box cutter > or the like. The upside is that this is the most precise method of > trimming the film and was the factory-recommended method. > > c) There is the credit-card method. This requires removal of the > lens and is consequently the slowest of the methods and the most > cumbersome. Some folks do like it but Leitz recommended against this > in the 1970's when it was first proposed, as providing a possibility > of film chips jamming the works, but see a), supra, for Tom's > knowledgeable remarks. In this method, the lens is removed, the > shutter is set to either T or Z, depending on the model, the base is > removed, and a thin bit of celluloid is inserted from the bottom into > the film gate. The film is then inserted and worked into position. A > fair number of folks love this method. I have never managed to do > this in less than a minute, what with removing the lens and base and > then returning them to battery. (Note that the lamented Phillip > Marlowe always used the celluloid cover over his California driver's > license to force locks when he was out-and-about; at least the > advocates of this system are not breaking any laws albeit they are > being very disrespectful of the wishes of Oscar Barnack.) > > d) Then there are the clippers. Take the new roll of film, pull > some out of the cassette, eyeball it, and use scissors to cut off the > requisite amount and load. This is the most rapid of the systems and > is one which even Jo-Jo the Brainless Village Idiot can learn on three > repetitions, especially with the aid of that tell-all Leitz decal on > the bottom plate. (Mark Rabiner's thumbnail method is a variant of > this, of course.) > > Me? I have used all four of these but I opted, back in the longago, > for d). I always have a Swiss Army Knife with me, as I have had since > I was fourteen, and just clip the film. The first time I did this, it > took me fifteen or twenty seconds but now takes me five seconds or so > to clip. Open the base, clip the film, pull the take-up spool, insert > the film into the take-up spool, insert the two, and close the base. > It takes fifteen or twenty seconds and Bob's your uncle. If Grandma > Leitz had not meant for it to be done this way, we would not have that > mystic decal in our cameras. Surely those gnomes of Wetzlar must have > known SOMETHING, or we'd not be using these cameras. > > I am always surprised at the heat and length of discussion this topic > takes, every time it arises. Find the method which works for you, and > use it. But the missionary zeal the topic engenders is a bit > frightening. There is no "right" method. There is the method > recommended by the factory, the ABLON, and the other methods, and the > one which works for you is the method appropriate for you, but, > perhaps, not a method another would want to use. > > Marc > > > msmall@aya.yale.edu > Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir! > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >