Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I vote for colo(u)r. The painting/tapestry behind the man is an important part of the portrait, and that element is much better in colour. Nathan Ted Grant wrote: > Hi Crew, > Here's your chance to shoot at me! ;-) > > Which version is the better? B&W or COLOUR? > Or the stronger of the photographs? > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/tmax/%232+WCG+col__MG_4332.jpg.html > > http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/tmax/B_amp_W+WCG_MG_4332.jpg.html > > ted > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands *Opportunistic Image Acquisition* General photography: http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com http://www.greatpix.eu Picture-A-Week: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507 Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog SUPPORT FREEDOM OF SPEECH, BUY DANISH PRODUCTS!