Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If I ran the test at f5.6, you would have a problem seeing the difference between the Summitar and the current Summicron. The Summitar is very nice. Len On May 12, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote: > The bottom two are pretty poor, I assume due to the maze and > cleaning marks. > The Hexanon and Summitar hold up well. > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA > http://www.400tx.com > http://400tx.blogspot.com/ > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org > [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of > Leonard > Taupier > Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 11:59 AM > To: Leica Users Group > Subject: [Leica] IMG:Test of six 50's > > > I just made a composite photo of the same section of six photos taken > with six different Leica M and LTM lenses on my M8. > From top to bottom the photo strips represent shots taken with the > following lenses at f2 only. All of the lenses had their lens hoods > attached. > > Leica Summilux ASPH (current) > > Leica Summicron (current) > > Konica Hexanon (last current) > > Leica Summitar (very slight haze at edges, coating very good) > > Leica Summicron ( slight haze, slight cleaning marks) > > Leica Summarit ( very slight haze, very slight cleaning marks) > > I rank the order of the lenses with best on top. The top 3 are much > better then the bottom 3 for resolution. Of the bottom 3 the Summitar > has the best contrast, the Summicron coll the best resolution. > > You can judge for yourself. > > http://tinyurl.com/2xdfyt > > Len > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information