Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: M8-not ready for Prime Time (a long and sorrowful lament)
From: sonc.hegr at gmail.com (Sonny Carter)
Date: Sun May 6 15:45:50 2007
References: <200705061833.l46IWAYh012520@server1.waverley.reid.org> <08723FF4-B418-4D3A-8837-A92060076050@optonline.net>

On 5/6/07, Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin@optonline.net> wrote:
>
> I don't know what percentage of the LUG owns M8 cameras but a number
> of Luggers have complained about glitches, inadequacies, and outright
> failures.
>

---------------------------------------


A number  of  Luggers  complained about glitches  with the M7,   M6ttl, M6
and M5 too, also earlier cameras.   .  Most of those glitches got fixed, and
they go on.  My own new M6 had no  operating film counter out of the box,
and five years later it failed again.  No other problems that I can
remember, but that wasn't even electronic.
----------------------

I too would be more than a little pissed if my long awaited
> Leica camera was defective.


---------------------


That was the thing that held me back a couple months, and  M8less, I
expressed some of the same things you and Walt do, until an M8 user offered
to let me use his for a month.  I did not take him up on that wonderful
offer, but it made me think about how much he believed in it.  So, I went
ahaed and got the next one available from Newtonville Camera.
--------------------

Arbitrarily assuming that 10% of the LUG
> has purchased the M8 and that only a dozen buyers are unsatisfied,
> that's a failure rate of about 6%. Far too great for a $5000 prestige
> camera.

------------------------
The key word here is "Arbitrarily."  You base a lot of facts on an arbitrary
assumption.  I would expect more precision from an engineer.   In my work,
you need to cite references.

I know that there have been problems and glitches, and I'm sorry that this
shutter fault has occurred to my pal Jeffery, but  as I have chased an
answer for him, I cannot find many references to this fault.  There are
others, but it seems to be relatively rare.

Neither of us have access to worldwide sales, but I'd expect that the number
of glitches from the total is rather lower than 6%.  I can't prove that, but
then you have no basis for 6%; just a guess.
-------------------------

But why so many complaints about a new digital camera when older
Leicas are cherished for their reliability.
----------------------

If they are so reliable,  why does DAG, Sherry,Ken Ruth, and  Leica have
such a backlog?

While you are correct that some of us have had trouble, the lion's share of
grousing about the M8  and "why it is such a piece of work" comes from
people who don't own it. This is a scenario that is played on every forum
serving Leica users.  Meanwhile, those of us who are using it are finding
that it shows us the weaknesses of lenses, and our own pilot errors.

I love my M8 because it has returned me to the point that I control the
picture, and that's something no digital camera offered me before.

Even Jeffery loves his, he just wants it to work right, and that is totally
understandable. I have no question that it will.


>
>
-- 
Regards,

Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
Natchitoches, Louisiana
USA

Replies: Reply from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Re: M8-not ready for Prime Time (a long and sorrowful lament))
Reply from kididdoc at cox.net (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] Re: M8-not ready for Prime Time (a long and sorrowful lament))
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at optonline.net (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Re: M8-not ready for Prime Time (a long and sorrowful lament))