Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/05/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron - NowSummitar
From: jhnichols at bellsouth.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Sun May 6 14:25:56 2007
References: <000301c7901b$5d5de5e0$619acc48@GATEWAY>

Jeffery,

I found a couple of images in my LUG gallery that were made with the 
Summitar.  It is really better than these images demonstrate.

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Fire_Below.jpg.html

http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Motor_Glider_01.jpg.html

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith342@cox.net>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 3:15 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron - 
NowSummitar


>I mean pancake flat, like an Elmar. Daniel want to put it in his trouser
> pocket.
>
> But now that you mention it, last week a guest speaker at the LHSA spring
> shoot mentioned some excellent low contrast Leica lenses, but I failed to
> write it down. Like you, I get terrible contrast problems in the 
> subtropical
> sun down here. The lens he mentioned was probably single-coated, 
> post-WWII.
> It wasn't the Summarit or the Summaron (I have both of those). My
> recollection (fuzzy) was that it was a Summitar. Anyone out there use one 
> of
> those these days?
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> http://www.400tx.com
> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of 
> slobodan
> dimitrov
> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 2:07 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron
>
>
> In my lighting environment, the harbors of LA and LB, their contrast
> suits me just fine.
>
> S. Dimitrov
>
>
>
> On May 6, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I started one re: people's thoughts on 35mm LTM lenses, but I
>> didn't
>> care if they were FLAT.
>>
>> Jeffery Smith
>> New Orleans, LA
>> http://www.400tx.com
>> http://400tx.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org
>> [mailto:lug-bounces+jsmith342=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
>> Daniel
>> Ridings
>> Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 3:16 AM
>> To: Leica Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron
>>
>>
>> Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>
>>> Is it my brain or did we have a 35mm LTM thread last week or the week
>>> before Remember how I mentioned my Summaron? Others mentioned others?
>>
>> I am sorry to have missed it. I have had to pass over hundreds, if
>> not a
>> couple thousand, postings lately. I just haven't been able to keep up.
>>
>> Thanks for the tip. I'll check out the archives.
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from jsmith342 at cox.net (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Experiences with 35/3.5 Elmar and 35/3.5 Summaron - Now Summitar)