Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]But would you move something in the foreground? Say a cup on a table that was cluttering the image. I know I've moved rubbish bins in the past to get a shot :-), but then I'd never claim to be a documentary shooter, just a part time snapper. Steve On 18/4/07 01:39, "Tina Manley" <images@comporium.net> wrote: > > What do you think? Does previsualization mean that the photograph > was manipulated subconsciously? I don't think so. I might imagine a > photo that I would like to take of a family in Central America, but > that would only mean that I would only look for situations to take > that photo. I would never move people into position or change > circumstances to make the photo happen when it wouldn't have without > my being there. Moving people into position or suggesting situations > or adding lights or manipulating photographs in the darkroom goes way > beyond previsualization, to me, and would not be acceptable for > documentary or news photographs. I think many so-called documentary > photographs today should be reclassified as art photographs if the > situations were manipulated or directed by the photographer. That is > not documentary or news photography.