Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 12:25 AM -0400 4/11/07, Stan Yoder wrote:
>I did the math on the diagonal of the 18x27mm sensor of the M8.
>Turns out to be 32mm near enough, which is what the 24 becomes on an
>M8. So the 24 is the theoretical "normal" for the M8. However, the
>50mm 'normal' lens on 35mm film cameras would be better matched by a
>28mm on the M8 (=37mm.)
Stan, I think you're doing a double conversion there. The theoretical
'normal' lens, ie, the diagonal, is the actual diagonal. In this case
it's 32mm. Therefore if anyone made a 32mm lens, that would be a
'normal' lens on the M8. The 24 is a wide on the M8.
The field of view of the 50 on 35mm film is matched by a 37.5mm lens
on the M8. A 28mm lens gives the equivalent of a 37mm lens on 35mm
film.
>Actually, the 28 framelines of the M8 VF include slightly more than
>the 50 lines of my M2's VF.
>
>And, since a 35mm lens is/was the functional 'normal' with film for
>many of us, a 21mm lens would be the near-equivalent on an M8.
Again, you're doing a double conversion. The closest common focal
length equivalent to the angle of view of a 35mm lens on 35mm film is
the 28mm lens on the M8.
>
>Or am I all wet?
>
>Stan Yoder
>Pittsburgh
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com