Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 6:23 PM -0500 3/27/07, Clive Moss wrote:
>"The 21 Leica finder is very
> accurate with respect to 21mm lenses on the M8" - you mean the 28mm
>finder, right?
You're quite right, of course. The 28 finder.
>I'll bet that the 28mm Leica finder cost more than the whole 21mm CV
>lens. The CV Mini sounds usable.
It's a chrome metal one that I bought new about '73. So probably not.
I didn't have a 28mm lens for about 30 years, so it didn't get
smashed like all the 21 finders I went through.
>
>Or maybe I'll just use the unframed total view through the M8 as being 21mm.
>
>--
>Clive
>http://www.clive.moss.net/blog/
>
>on 3/27/2007 5:40 PM Henning Wulff said the following:
>...
>>The 28/35 mini shows noticeably less than the 28 Leica finder and
>>it's harder to see the edges with glasses. The 21 Leica finder is
>>very accurate with respect to 21mm lenses on the M8. On the other
>>hand, the CV mini is small enough to leave on the camera if you're
>>using the 21mm lens fairly regularly.
>>
>...
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
--
* Henning J. Wulff
/|\ Wulff Photography & Design
/###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
|[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com