Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 6 bit coding for m8 lenses; Sharpie?
From: grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey@mchsi.com)
Date: Tue Mar 13 16:59:10 2007

I'll go for the manual coding, at least for focal length, then you could 
have coding for non codable lenses, both Leica and non Leica.

gene


-------------- Original message from Robert Rose <robert.rose@mac.com>: 
-------------- 


> I had the 35mm coded, but I will wait until I see the result of using the 
> filters on the balance of the lenses. From my results on a 17-55 Nikon 
> lens, the IR magenta case doesn't show up until you are at 21mm and below. 
> At 17mm it is pronounced. 
> 
> For the Noctilux, the vignetting issue seems to be gone since the smaller 
> sensor has taken only the "sweet spot" where vignetting is not noticeable. 
> 
> For the Tri-Elmar, I plan on waiting to see whether it needs it. I don't 
> know whether the camera is able to detect which of the three focal lengths 
> is dialed in, so why bother with the coding? 
> 
> Has anyone had luck with the Sharpie method of coding? 
> 
> Can we start a petition to ask Leica to put manual coding into the next 
> firmware upgrade? 
> 
> Bob Rose 
> 
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> Message: 18 
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:57:24 -0400 
> From: Leonard Taupier 
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 6 bit coding for m8 lenses 
> To: Leica Users Group 
> Message-ID: <51FEF0CB-1BCD-4C95-A96E-338148C8921F@comcast.net> 
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed 
> 
> Terry, 
> 
> I'm only coding my wide angles. Except for seeing which lens was used 
> in the EXIF data, I see no reason to code above 35mm. I have filters 
> on all my lenses except those which take 60mm filters and see nothing 
> wrong with 50mm and above. I can't speak for the Noctilux but I don't 
> see vignetting and coding won't make it focus better. 
> 
> Regards, 
> Len 
> 
> 
> On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:18 AM, terry wrote: 
> 
> > I am wondering what the LUG sees as the big advantage to having all 
> > your Leica lenses coded? 
> > 28, 35, 50 1.4, 50 1.0, 75, 90 
> > 
> > Given the turn around time I received on one lens (28) I am 
> > wondering how I would ever schedule the 
> > rest imbetween jobs and use. 
> > 
> > Terry 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Leica Users Group. 
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information