Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would agree with Len, but I'm not sure the 35 even needs coding, as I see no problems with my 35 and the filter, both those wider It is needed from what I have read. Gene -------------- Original message from Leonard Taupier <len-1@comcast.net>: -------------- > Terry, > > I'm only coding my wide angles. Except for seeing which lens was used > in the EXIF data, I see no reason to code above 35mm. I have filters > on all my lenses except those which take 60mm filters and see nothing > wrong with 50mm and above. I can't speak for the Noctilux but I don't > see vignetting and coding won't make it focus better. > > Regards, > Len > > > On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:18 AM, terry wrote: > > > I am wondering what the LUG sees as the big advantage to having all > > your Leica lenses coded? > > 28, 35, 50 1.4, 50 1.0, 75, 90 > > > > Given the turn around time I received on one lens (28) I am > > wondering how I would ever schedule the > > rest imbetween jobs and use. > > > > Terry > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information