Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I had the 35mm coded, but I will wait until I see the result of using the filters on the balance of the lenses. From my results on a 17-55 Nikon lens, the IR magenta case doesn't show up until you are at 21mm and below. At 17mm it is pronounced. For the Noctilux, the vignetting issue seems to be gone since the smaller sensor has taken only the "sweet spot" where vignetting is not noticeable. For the Tri-Elmar, I plan on waiting to see whether it needs it. I don't know whether the camera is able to detect which of the three focal lengths is dialed in, so why bother with the coding? Has anyone had luck with the Sharpie method of coding? Can we start a petition to ask Leica to put manual coding into the next firmware upgrade? Bob Rose ------------------------------ Message: 18 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:57:24 -0400 From: Leonard Taupier <len-1@comcast.net> Subject: Re: [Leica] 6 bit coding for m8 lenses To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> Message-ID: <51FEF0CB-1BCD-4C95-A96E-338148C8921F@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Terry, I'm only coding my wide angles. Except for seeing which lens was used in the EXIF data, I see no reason to code above 35mm. I have filters on all my lenses except those which take 60mm filters and see nothing wrong with 50mm and above. I can't speak for the Noctilux but I don't see vignetting and coding won't make it focus better. Regards, Len On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:18 AM, terry wrote: > I am wondering what the LUG sees as the big advantage to having all > your Leica lenses coded? > 28, 35, 50 1.4, 50 1.0, 75, 90 > > Given the turn around time I received on one lens (28) I am > wondering how I would ever schedule the > rest imbetween jobs and use. > > Terry