Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Coming in late to this discussion there are several points to make. First, both lenses were stopped down to F11 at which point diffraction should be leveling the playing field so differences are due to the on camera imaging chain. Second, in camera sharpening or lack can have an effect. Both images where sharpened alike in LR so there is an optimization opportunity. Third, while trekking in Death Valley last week my bag with a body and six lenses was considerably smaller, lighter, faster optics, and less unwieldy than my companions carrying a simple two lens SLR outfit 17-40/70-200 or equivalent. Plus, IR was but a filter away. Fourth, rangefinders float my boat and make me happy. On 3/8/07, Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com> wrote: > > Comparison images from D200 and M8 > > <http://www.alexandertufte.com/D200VSM8web/> > > files from both cameras were converted in LR at default setting...by > Alexander Tufte > www.alexandertufte.com > > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george@imagist.com > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Don don.dory@gmail.com