Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/03/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I looked at the images, and I'm glad to be using the Leica as well. I had an email to say the IR filters are shipping, so its slowly coming together. ;-) > Coming in late to this discussion there are several points to make. > First, both lenses were stopped down to F11 at which point diffraction > should be leveling the playing field so differences are due to the on > camera > imaging chain. > Second, in camera sharpening or lack can have an effect. Both images > where > sharpened alike in LR so there is an optimization opportunity. > Third, while trekking in Death Valley last week my bag with a body and six > lenses was considerably smaller, lighter, faster optics, and less unwieldy > than my companions carrying a simple two lens SLR outfit 17-40/70-200 or > equivalent. Plus, IR was but a filter away. > Fourth, rangefinders float my boat and make me happy. > > > On 3/8/07, Lottermoser George <imagist3@mac.com> wrote: >> >> Comparison images from D200 and M8 >> >> <http://www.alexandertufte.com/D200VSM8web/> >> >> files from both cameras were converted in LR at default setting...by >> Alexander Tufte >> www.alexandertufte.com >> >> >> Regards, >> George Lottermoser >> george@imagist.com >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > > -- > Don > don.dory@gmail.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >