[Leica] The Elusive Digilux 3 (NOT DLlux3)

[rsphotoimages at comcast.net (Bob Shaw)]

Hm-m-m-m-m-m.  He sure gets in close for such a long lens.  Wonder  
why...

So anybody who buys one gets assignments like that every day, right?


Bob



On Feb 19, 2007, at 6:25, Christopher Williams wrote:

Bob,

Better check with this guy:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/features/2007_swimsuit/models/ 
marisa_miller/07_marisa_miller_41.html

Chris

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Shaw" Subject: [Leica] The  
Elusive Digilux 3 (NOT DLlux3)


> As do many reading this, I belong to more than I Leica-centric forum.   
> Five, by my last count.
> I have yet to see a post with photos and actual narrative from the  
> owner of a Digilux 3.
> The Matsushita/Pana/Leica Lumix version abounds in Best Buy, CompUSA,  
> Circuit City and other big box stores for between $ 1,800 and $ 2,400  
> US.  More towards the $ 2,400 dollar price in "real" camera stores.
> Is it because a 3-year Warranty, better firmware and the Red Dot are  
> not enough?  Is it because the Olympus 4/3 body comes with 2 lenses in  
> kit for around half of the Lumix?
> I wonder.
> I've seen Lecia-produced images from the Digilux 3.  Lovely.
> But so are those posted by owners of the Lumix, and the Olympus with  
> Leica adaptor and an R Vario 70-180 APO, etc.
> Any thoughts on this?  Perhaps a very shy Digilux 3 owner who could  
> grace us with their input?
> It's been 3 months or so since the product hit the stores.  What's  
> going on with the Digilux 3?
> Bob in Seattle.


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information