Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, Better check with this guy: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/features/2007_swimsuit/models/marisa_miller/07_marisa_miller_41.html Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Shaw" Subject: [Leica] The Elusive Digilux 3 (NOT DLlux3) > As do many reading this, I belong to more than I Leica-centric forum. > Five, by my last count. > > I have yet to see a post with photos and actual narrative from the > owner of a Digilux 3. > > The Matsushita/Pana/Leica Lumix version abounds in Best Buy, CompUSA, > Circuit City and other big box stores for between $ 1,800 and $ 2,400 > US. More towards the $ 2,400 dollar price in "real" camera stores. > > Is it because a 3-year Warranty, better firmware and the Red Dot are > not enough? Is it because the Olympus 4/3 body comes with 2 lenses in > kit for around half of the Lumix? > > I wonder. > > I've seen Lecia-produced images from the Digilux 3. Lovely. > > But so are those posted by owners of the Lumix, and the Olympus with > Leica adaptor and an R Vario 70-180 APO, etc. > > Any thoughts on this? Perhaps a very shy Digilux 3 owner who could > grace us with their input? > > It's been 3 months or so since the product hit the stores. What's > going on with the Digilux 3? > > > Bob in Seattle.