Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Feb 15, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Tina Manley wrote: > At 11:50 AM 2/15/2007, Wade Heninger wrote: >> Personally, I like the reduced volume... > > I don't! You can always delete messages if there are too many to > read, but you can't read messages that have never been sent. the free give and take is what makes the LUG unique...that's what it's all about... I agree fully with Tina... use your delete finger... ad lib, no restrictions... and personally I feel that putting headers to "help" people is itself part of the problem... things like IMG, and the like already subdivide the LUG more than is necessary... get rid of it... I think the LUG should consist of members, with all levels of involvement, those who actively participate, delete, or move on... as always... Steve > You could always set up a filter for certain people, like BD > does ;-) I like the LUG like it was. The LUG is a unique > community and restricting the traffic will make it like every other > list out there. > > My two cents sent to Reply All. > > Tina > > Tina Manley, ASMP, NPPA > http://www.pbase.com/tinamanley/portfolio > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information