Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Recent Lightroom buyers...
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Mon Feb 12 20:02:16 2007
References: <p06240810c1f6ce7fe077@131.142.8.12> <m2ps8en4z3.fsf@whitefish.local> <4cfa589b0702121855rf4901eck3342b77a9058f0c6@mail.gmail.com> <p0623093ac1f6de69b24f@[10.1.16.144]>

Thanks all.  It obviously pays to read the fine print on the Adobe 
site.  Guess I'll wait until it's been out a few weeks and ask my 
question again.

It blows my mind to think a 1.8 GHz machine might be too slow to run 
these apps, but it's beginning to look like that might be the case.

>At 6:55 PM -0800 2/12/07, Adam Bridge wrote:
>>But there are more recent versions of Lightroom floating around. They
>>showed a version at MacWorld that was substantially quicker and had
>>more features than Beta 3
>
>I have beta 4 from Oct 06. I think that might have been the last 
>one, although I wasn't at MacWorld this year.
>
>--
>    *            Henning J. Wulff
>   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
>  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
>  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick

In reply to: Message from leica at dmason.net (Dave Mason) ([Leica] Recent Lightroom buyers...)
Message from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Recent Lightroom buyers...)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Recent Lightroom buyers...)