Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/02/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] visoflex help
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Sat Feb 3 02:29:54 2007
References: <005d01c746a0$372dd250$6501a8c0@asus930> <6.2.1.2.2.20070202105115.02ab5530@pop.med.cornell.edu><000e01c74723$25997570$6501a8c0@asus930> <45C3CF86.9060405@wanadoo.nl><001201c7472c$75a06ed0$6501a8c0@asus930> <45C43C18.8010801@wanadoo.nl>

Thanks Michiel. It seems from my research now that I would need the OTZFO 
universal focusing mount firstly. That would work with the
65, the 90 2.8 Elmar and my 135 4 Tele Elmar.
If I wanted to use the 135 4 Elmar, my earlier 135, I would need the OTSRO 
adaptor as well. Then an OTRPO extension tube if I want
to go closer!
There's a whole new language here for me to assimilate. I really do need to 
track down those Leica brochures. The Hove book may be
an excellent choice. I just got the reprint of the 111c,f,g instructions and 
it is very good for the purpose.

Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Michiel Fokkema
Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2007 17:39
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] visoflex help

Hi,

I guess I have to look it up. Tomorrow evening I have some time.
I'm sure the threads of the TE and the Hektor are different.
Very helpful is the Leica accesoire book made bij Hove. I also have a 
lot of old catalog's which have a wealth of information on theses things.

Cheers,

Michiel Fokkema

G Hopkinson wrote:
> I've added to my own confusion here. The 135's that I have are the 4.0/135 
> Elmar, 1960 and the 4.0/135 Tele-Elmar, 1965. The
optical
> cells are quite different in profile when I look at them side by side. The 
> Tele Elmar has one large thread and an inner smaller
> thread. 
> So there must be completely different mounts/adaptors????
> The normal M bayonet presumably will allow fitting to the Visoflex II 
> without any adapting? Presumably that would work differently
> to the optical cells and their relevant adaptors?
> Sorry to be dense. I'm sure it will start to make more sense when I have 
> the Visoflex II in hand. I need to read a lot more on
this.
> 
> Cheers
> Hoppy
> 
> Cheers
> Hoppy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
> [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf
Of
> Michiel Fokkema
> Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2007 09:56
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] visoflex help
> 
> Hmm,
> 
> I'm pretty sure the Hektor and Elmar use a different adapter. To make 
> sure I have to dive into my literature.
>> Hoppy,
>>   The appropriate adaptor is 16464 which will work for:
>> Tele-Elmar 135 f/4 (infin-1:5),
>> Hector and Elmar 135 (infin - 1:5),
>> 90 f/2.8 first version (infin -1:3.3), and
>> 65 f/3.5 (infin -1:2.5).
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Best regards,

Michiel Fokkema


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] visoflex help)
In reply to: Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] visoflex help)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] visoflex help)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] visoflex help)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] visoflex help)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] visoflex help)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] visoflex help)