Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: now: Stealth M8 mode (Re: [Leica] three days with M8)
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Tue Jan 23 15:05:45 2007
References: <C1DC1C69.5CCC%lug@steveunsworth.co.uk> <933F1BA4-3D96-45D7-9ABB-FBE4667DC1B5@mac.com>

At 3:01 PM -0600 1/23/07, Lottermoser George wrote:
>For me - probably just because the 20D had half stop increments and 
>the 5D third stop increments. I tend to choose the ISO for the 
>shutter speed/f stop combination I want. More choices means more 
>fine tuning of shutter/f stop and noise control.
>
>Regards,
>George Lottermoser
>george@imagist.com
>

The 20D only has full stop increments, and the 5D for most of us as 
well. The intermediate stops on the 5D actually produce more noise 
than the next up full stop, so there is rarely any reason to use the 
intermediate stops.

On the other hand, I wouldn't mind an 80 or even 40 on the M8, as 
long as it doesn't compromise dynamic range, as it does on the Canons.

-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) (now: Stealth M8 mode (Re: [Leica] three days with M8))
In reply to: Message from lug at steveunsworth.co.uk (Steve Unsworth) (now: Stealth M8 mode (Re: [Leica] three days with M8))
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) (now: Stealth M8 mode (Re: [Leica] three days with M8))