Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2007/01/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] M8 love - Noctilux or Nokton?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George)
Date: Thu Jan 18 16:18:45 2007
References: <C1D54D8F.42ADA%mark@rabinergroup.com> <66DA90B0-F970-49D7-95D3-F1C2FD83D1C0@pandora.be> <p06230908c1d5a1b1ca5f@[10.1.16.144]> <003d01c73b55$abe1cf30$2101a8c0@luispersonal>
Nearly complete lack of flare ;~)
Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com
On Jan 18, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Luis Ripoll wrote:
> Is there any reason to have a Nocti to use it at F2 or F1,4?
Replies:
Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] M8 love - Noctilux or Nokton?)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M8 love - Noctilux or Nokton?)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M8 love - Noctilux or Nokton?)
Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] M8 love - Noctilux or Nokton?)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] M8 love - Noctilux or Nokton?)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica] M8 love - Noctilux or Nokton?)