Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens and the vignetting saga
From: hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson)
Date: Wed Jan 17 15:54:28 2007
References: <200701161808.l0GI8fbJ090441@server1.waverley.reid.org><F252859B-058A-42FC-9181-CC4468DC76D8@ciudad.com.ar><000001c739ed$a57fd880$6501a8c0@asus930><E782C9E4-1D0A-4758-AA7B-B0BCAF0586C9@mac.com><001201c73a8d$85cd1c00$6501a8c0@asus930> <A5E9F992-C5CB-43E7-B4B9-221E891FADAA@mac.com>

George, this is the first time I have posted this one. It was such a boring 
shot it never made it to the scanner before. I just
picked it on the light box for the example. The others I have before, and 
some others since culled from my gallery. You are kind to
remember. No tonal manipulation at all as it's meant to be an example. The 
only other thing I can think of is that it was not with
the 28. That would only leave it as the 50 summicron or my 90 Elmarit M. I 
guess the fifty is possible. It just looks to be the 28
to my eye and that lens was largely permanently attached on that particular 
excursion. I was shooting from a boat and using (with
the 28) an external finder and estimated focus using the inherent DOF. What 
do you think, could this be the fifty? I'm back delving
into the archives now. No exif data in Velvia!

Cheers
Hoppy

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org 
[mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Lottermoser George
Sent: Thursday, 18 January 2007 09:30
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens and the vignetting saga

On Jan 17, 2007, at 5:16 PM, G Hopkinson wrote:
> Thanks George. A good opportunity to revisit your gallery as well.  
> Also some fine portraits of your friend. Like all of the dog
> families on the list, I share your sadness there.

Thanks Hoppy.

> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/a/Tas/vignette+test.jpg.html
>

While I have limited experience with the Cron - only a couple rolls -  
I find it almost hard to believe that the above photo was shot with  
the lens without treating the corners. When I originally saw this  
image (back when you first posted it) I assumed that you'd  
manipulated the corners. I wonder if it is possible for vignetting to  
vary according with individual specimens - seems unlikely.

Regards,
George Lottermoser
george@imagist.com





_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens and the vignetting saga)
Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens and the vignetting saga)
In reply to: Message from jim.christie at sbcglobal.net (Jim Christie) ([Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens)
Message from eduardoalbesi at ciudad.com.ar (Eduardo Albesi) ([Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens and the vignetting saga)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens and the vignetting saga)
Message from hoppyman at bigpond.net.au (G Hopkinson) ([Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens and the vignetting saga)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (Lottermoser George) ([Leica] New 28mm Elmarit M Lens and the vignetting saga)