Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree Montie, however no need for an apologetic nod to Ansel. Each print was extensively manipulated in the darkroom (and to magnificent effect) as you know. PS is just a different set of tools. Now that HCB fellow might have had something to say regarding cropping.... Cheers Hoppy -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+hoppyman=bigpond.net.au@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Montie Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2007 03:17 To: lug@leica-users.org Subject: [Leica] Re: vroger PAW 2 Terrific...a nice little abstract slice of small town Americana!! No need for apologies IMO...a pic is a pic is an image is a pic etc. PhotoShop or dark room slop...my purist days are long gone... Ansel, if you happen to read this...please R.I.P ;-) Montie On Jan 10, 2007, at 10:10 AM, Victor Rubin wrote: > Hi All: > This is the firat time I've shared a photo like this. I was walking in > Beacon New York, when I saw this simple, lonely street. The ISO was > 800 and > I took the image. When I returned home and looked at it, I was > reminded of > work I had seen at the Edward Hopper exhibit at the Whitney Museum. I > Photoshopped it until I had a result which I liked and now share > with you. > Somehow, it feels strange to put an image this "doctored" on the > PAW site, > but I personally like it vary much. So those of you who think it too > "impure" as a PAW image, forgive me. Next week will be back to normal. > Bests: vroger > http://vroger.smugmug.com/gallery/2321992/1/122308785/Large > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information