Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2007/01/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Rossella Scanned (correct URL)
From: richard-lists at imagecraft.com (Richard)
Date: Tue Jan 2 20:09:43 2007
References: <B6C52463-9558-413F-B810-67F737B82B22@comcast.net>

Can't really tell much difference on a monitor except slightly sepia tone 
with the 2nd one...

At 07:55 PM 1/2/2007, Jesse Hellman wrote:
>I am learning how to scan a negative, thanks to help and
>encouragement here. The photograph of Rossella Sborzacchi on page 5
>of my Spoleto pictures looked harsher than the original print, from
>which it was scanned. So now, next to it, is Rossella scanned from
>the negative in glorious 32 bit color, contrast adjusted in levels,
>burned in using the sponge burn-in tool, and sharpened. It looks to
>me closer to the smoothness and depth of the original print, at least
>on my monitor. I am eager to hear any and all opinions. The picture
>is Tri-X, F/1/4 at 1/60 sec.
>
>Current image:
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Jesse+Hellman/Spoleto+2006/ 
>ViaggiatoriRossellaTruccata72.jpg.html>
>
>New scanned image, correct URL:
><http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Jesse+Hellman/Spoleto+2006/ 
>Rossella002a72.jpg.html>
>
>Jesse

// richard (This email is for mailing lists. To reach me directly, please 
use richard at imagecraft.com) 


In reply to: Message from hellman at comcast.net (Jesse Hellman) ([Leica] IMG: Rossella Scanned (correct URL))