[Leica] Is it just me?

[len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier)]

Philip,

I don't think I've seen any reviews of this lens either. This lens is  
only to appease the M8 buyers, like the Nikon 12~24 is for their  
digital bodies. From a cost standpoint I doubt if a single 18mm f2.8  
from Leica would cost less. As a film M user I would not buy this  
lens. I hardly use my 21mm now but use 28mm all the time. I do have  
the original Tri-Elmar and like that lens a lot. But those are the  
most used focal lengths for M users. As a walk-around lens the f4  
speed is not a big hindrance. But I do carry a Summilux in my pocket  
just in case I need it. Bottom line, I don't think this will be a big  
seller, along with its costly new viewfinder.

Len


On Nov 29, 2006, at 3:57 PM, Philip Forrest wrote:

> When I was handling the M8 a few weeks ago, I heard about this new
> Tri-Elmar, the wide angle one.  16/18/21 correct?  Now, at f/4  
> aren't we
> giving up a little bit of light for these three focal lengths?   
> That is, Why
> not just have a 15mm or a 16 or the 21?  A person could get a 21 a  
> full stop
> faster or at the same speed, you could get a range of focal lengths  
> for the
> same price as the new wide angle zoom.  I'm only saying this  
> because the
> difference between 16mm and 21mm is so slight that you can walk it  
> in 6
> steps.  I can't imagine looking at a scene and saying "if I only  
> had a lens
> two millimeters longer (or wider)."  instead, I'd just take two  
> steps and
> shoot.  Three focal lengths, very close to each other in  
> appearance, less
> speed, greater size and more weight.  Granted, I'll not be able to  
> afford
> one, but it seems like this marketing of Leica's is in the wrong  
> place.
> It's an expensive lens to make and the company needs to make up the  
> costs of
> production as well as make a profit, hopefully keeping themselves  
> alive for
> years to come.  This looks like it will be a connoisseur's/ 
> collector's lens
> at best but is that were the company should be concentrating it's  
> marketing?
> Perhaps I missed the thread where the new Tri-Elmar wide was run  
> through
> it's paces, but it just seems like a solution for a problem that never
> existed.
>
> Philip
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information