Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M8 & Infrared //Erwin Puts article on the subject
From: s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal)
Date: Sat Nov 25 12:27:09 2006
References: <200611241934.kAOJYJiv075075@server1.waverley.reid.org><000e01c7106f$889ddd90$bf34a33e@symke> <37433C73-86F1-4550-B882-6A3FF7BAFA19@comcast.net>

Agreed i still prefer using a M3 with Kodak technical pan or Agfa copex.
Needs a nit of tweaking but i prefer both the look and the resolution.
best
simon jessurun
amsterdam
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Leonard Taupier" <len-1@comcast.net>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] M8 & Infrared //Erwin Puts article on the subject


> Simon,
> 
> I don't think Edwin's comments or M8 evaluations exactly address what  
> Jim Christie asked.
> 
> First off, using a RF camera like the Leica M is easier than with a  
> SLR. The IR filter can stay on the lens without obstructing the view  
> of the scene. IR film is more sensitive than a digital sensor so hand  
> holding the camera is more of a possibility with film. With the  
> digital SLR you need to either frame and focus the scene with the  
> camera on a tripod and with the filer removed, or prefocus and use an  
> external viewfinder with the filter on.
> 
> IR sensitivity of current digital cameras can vary from so so to not  
> at all (Nikon D200). In order to take images at all one must set the  
> ISO very high (800 or higher), hope you get an image at all  and live  
> with the resulting grain. The resulting image must then be converted  
> to monochrome or desaturated and the contrast increased for  
> acceptable IR photos.
> 
> Henning shared an IR photo with us that was taken with an M8,  
> handheld and at a lower ISO than what can generally be taken with the  
> current digital cameras. It was a beautiful image, sharp, very good  
> depth of field and lower grain than what I normally see from film. I  
> may be wrong but from memory I believe it was taken at ISO 640 (or  
> so). The short answer to Jim's question is YES.
> 
> Len
> 
> 
> On Nov 25, 2006, at 3:56 AM, animal wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> Erwin Puts article on the subject as well as his second review of  
>> the M8
>> http://www.imx.nl/photosite/comments/c029.html
>> http://www.imx.nl/photosite/leica/M8_2/t007.html
>>
>> seasons wishes
>> simon jessurun
>> amsterdam
>> the netherlands
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Christie"  
>> <jim.christie@sbcglobal.net>
>> To: <lug@leica-users.org>
>> Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:34 PM
>> Subject: [Leica] M8 & Infrared Photograph
>>
>>
>>> I've been trying to follow and understand the problem issues with  
>>> the new M8
>>> and I have the following question. Does the IR problem mean that  
>>> the M8 is
>>> more sensitive to IR light and, therefore, if you shoot for Infrared
>>> photographs without the proposed filter and use a normal IR filter  
>>> instead,
>>> will one get more Infrared light and possibly better IR photos?
>>>
>>> Jim Christie
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Replies: Reply from abridge at gmail.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] M8 & Infrared //Erwin Puts article on the subject)
In reply to: Message from jim.christie at sbcglobal.net (Jim Christie) ([Leica] M8 & Infrared Photograph)
Message from s.jessurun95 at chello.nl (animal) ([Leica] M8 & Infrared //Erwin Puts article on the subject)
Message from len-1 at comcast.net (Leonard Taupier) ([Leica] M8 & Infrared //Erwin Puts article on the subject)