Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2006/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (Chris Willliams)
From: s_gregory1 at mac.com (Scott Gregory)
Date: Fri Nov 17 08:15:30 2006
References: <DC4B73A4105FCE4FAE0CEF799BF84B36013F1C7E@case-email> <016701c709ef$b8ccc610$0a01a8c0@MacPhisto>
 
Chris, regarding that 17-55 2.8, have you used it indoors at a wedding 
ceremony with flash.

I'm going to be using an M body for a friend's small wedding that they have 
asked me to take pictures at on New Year's Eve.
I will also be taking a D2X as well but other than prime fast non auto focus 
lenses, I do not have a fast zoom, only the 18-200 3.5 etc.
which i don't think are fast enough for low light indoors. I've been 
thinking of investing in the 17-55 and would be interested in your comments
if you've used it for wedding work low light.

Thanks in advance.

Scott
Replies: Reply from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today (ChrisWillliams))
 In reply to: Message from drodgers at casefarms.com (David Rodgers) ([Leica] Exceptional lenses, and their value today)
Message from leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams) ([Leica] Re:Exceptional lenses, and their value today)